Thursday - July 15, 2021 | Climate
Are you greenwashing, wishing or walking?
(This article originally appeared in GreenBiz, July 15, 2021)
We are in the middle of the biggest commitment to a green future. Companies and countries all over the world are committing to net-zero goals and pledges to the SDGs; diversity, equity and inclusion goals; human rights — the list goes on.
Fewer have set science-based targets, as those targets come with a bit more scrutiny. Sciencebasedtargets.org reports on its website, “More than 1,000 businesses are working with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to reduce their emissions in line with climate science… Our team of technical experts will review your submission, validate it against our science-based criteria and communicate their decision with in-depth feedback.”
We need to put a lot of zeros on the “More than 1,000 businesses” in order to get to a net-zero carbon economy.
Goals, targets and commitments are worthless without accountability and enforcement — and that goes for countries as well as companies.
Many boardrooms around the world are presented with net-zero goals. Many are asked to nod to those goals. Some are given information about what goals the competitors are setting, and what the talent, customers and investors are expecting and demanding from the board. Some boards approve, some feel comfortable doing so and are hoping for the best; others are afraid to be called out on greenwashing but approve them anyway, because “everyone else” are setting goals.
I’m all for commitments, goals and especially science-based targets. Unfortunately, goals, targets and commitments are worthless without accountability and enforcement — and that goes for countries as well as companies.
Eleven years ago, in 2010, at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’s COP15, developed countries committed to a goal of mobilizing $100 billion per year by 2020, to address the needs of developing countries.
A long list of developed countries pledged but, according to the OECD 2020, not all have delivered.
Now, we are looking forward to COP26 in Glasgow and the stakes are high. The impact of a changing climate is being seen and felt all over the globe — and people and companies are starting to realize that after COVID-19 there is no more “normal.”
Supply chains are, and will likely be, more disrupted “than normal.” We will have water shortages that will affect companies’ ability to produce as they were used to doing. We will have climate refugees disrupting global stability. We will have major transitions that will cause anxiety, from those retiring, to those entering the job market, to parents wondering what world they are leaving to their children.
And we haven’t even put the COVID-19 pandemic to bed in many developing countries that desperately need a just transition. No wonder that the World Health Organization has declared mental health issues a pandemic alongside COVID-19.
Sunset, not sell
Boards of directors are needed more than ever to ask for and question the scenario analyses behind how climate change will affect their company’s assets and determine whether they are or will become stranded. We need to have boards ask how climate change will affect employees, suppliers, customers and the future supply and demand of their goods and services.
We need boards to ask if it is time to sunset, not sell, activities that are not part of a net-zero future — and we need boards to look to the horizon, into the sunrise, for the activities that will become the businesses of the future.
Now is the time to innovate, but also focus on how to transform existing business activities to a net-zero future.
That does not happen by itself. It does not happen by wishing that things were brighter or by producing fancy reports about commitments without allocating budgets and resources to walk the talk. It does not happen by talking about the small percentage of new business activities while continuing to spend most funds on existing old-economy activities. And it does not happen by selling those activities that are not part of the future net-zero economy to companies or organizations that do not have the same values or reputational risk at stake.
Climate change is not about who can make the biggest promises, but about who can deliver net-zero solutions and report on them in a transparent and accountable manner.
It is about saving the life on this planet we call our home.
Let’s stop greenwashing and green-wishing, let’s start green-walking — or rather, running “as if your life depends on it.” Because it does.BACK TO NEWS & VIEWS